Free
Message: Re: Pacer Digecor

Re: Pacer Digecor

posted on Nov 02, 2009 04:31PM

8 page long PDF uploaded at box.net.

I love this part...who are they kidding???

This Court should deny e.Digital’s Supplemental Bill of Costs because e.Digital is not the
prevailing party in this case.
e.Digital prevailed on only a fraction of the total claims raised in this litigation, and the Court entered a judgment in favor of digEcor in the amount of $80,000.00.


Nov 02, 2009 04:35PM
2
Nov 02, 2009 04:50PM
3
Nov 02, 2009 05:58PM
3
Nov 02, 2009 06:19PM
1
Nov 02, 2009 06:25PM
3
Nov 02, 2009 06:28PM
3
Nov 02, 2009 06:38PM

Nov 02, 2009 06:54PM
2
Nov 02, 2009 06:59PM
2
Nov 02, 2009 06:59PM
1
Nov 02, 2009 07:00PM
2
Nov 02, 2009 07:09PM

Nov 02, 2009 07:18PM
1
Nov 02, 2009 07:25PM

Nov 02, 2009 07:25PM
6
Nov 02, 2009 07:33PM
1
Nov 02, 2009 08:08PM

Nov 02, 2009 08:12PM
7
Nov 02, 2009 11:03PM
2
Nov 03, 2009 01:06PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply