Re: PACER digEcor
in response to
by
posted on
Sep 29, 2009 01:14PM
Doc 399.
Pursuant to Rules 52(b) and 59(e) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff digEcor, Inc. ("digEcor") moves the Court to make the following alterations and amendments:
(1) To amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law dated September 10, 2009, to include findings that digEcor paid e.Digital $80,000 for batteries e.Digital never shipped to digEcor and to include a conclusion that digEcor is entitled to a return of the full purchase price; and
(2) To alter the Judgment issued on September 14, 2009 to include an award to digEcor of the $80,000 purchase price. The grounds for this motion are that Defendant e.Digital did not dispute that it owes digEcor the $80,000 purchase price and this Court ruled in its March 13, 2009 Order and Memorandum Decision that digEcor was entitled to a return of the purchase price. This motion is supported by the accompanying memorandum. DATED this 25th day of September, 2009.