Free
Message: Re: Law360 Full Article...Kirkland - richardo insince
16
Aug 25, 2009 02:21PM
5
Aug 25, 2009 02:43PM
5
Aug 25, 2009 02:45PM
2
Aug 25, 2009 02:48PM

Aug 25, 2009 05:15PM
1
Aug 25, 2009 05:54PM

Aug 25, 2009 06:04PM
1
Aug 25, 2009 06:38PM
9
Aug 27, 2009 04:44AM
7
Aug 27, 2009 11:33AM
2
Aug 27, 2009 12:15PM

Aug 27, 2009 12:20PM
1
Aug 27, 2009 01:07PM
1
Aug 27, 2009 01:56PM

Hi Richardo,

I stand by what I originally posted. IMO, my reply does take into consideration what amount (without putting a number on it) I consider acceptable in order to bring our pps to a point that would allow LT shareholders to benefit from EDIG in the foreseable future, which to me is 2-3 yrs tops. In other words, none of the numbers that you put forth from Samsung are acceptable to me. It has to be more.

Samsung's one of the largest companies in the world, supposedly one of our biggest infringers, and if we can't get more than a $16-17 mil gross settlement from them, then WHO are we going to get it from? I can't place a value on it, that's not my area of expertise, and there are way too many variables that we are not privvy to.

I do feel that settlement amount wise, it's time to get out of the inflatable wading pool in the back yard and get out into the ocean, otherwise we are going to continue to take one step forwward, and one step back. I hope our patents are strong enough to do this for us all.


Aug 27, 2009 03:20PM
3
Aug 27, 2009 06:38PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply