Free
Message: Re: Questions-phoenix-ph...

Jul 24, 2009 10:17AM
1
Jul 24, 2009 10:22AM
1
Jul 24, 2009 10:38AM

Jul 24, 2009 10:38AM

Jul 24, 2009 10:42AM

Jul 24, 2009 10:51AM

Jul 24, 2009 10:56AM

Jul 24, 2009 11:05AM

Jul 24, 2009 11:11AM
2
Jul 24, 2009 11:17AM

Jul 24, 2009 11:28AM

Jul 24, 2009 11:37AM
1
Jul 24, 2009 11:43AM
2
Jul 24, 2009 11:44AM
1
Jul 24, 2009 11:46AM
1
Jul 24, 2009 11:55AM
4
Jul 24, 2009 12:10PM
4
Jul 24, 2009 12:35PM
3
Jul 24, 2009 12:58PM
1
Jul 24, 2009 01:44PM
4
Jul 24, 2009 02:10PM

Hmmm..once again moving on to other subjects...I'll bite...haha

ok, I'll agree you didn't state exactly that...I would surmise based on your posts that you feel the level of communications from the company is sufficient...posing that as a question so as not to restate your thoughts.

In my reply post that started this I did not restate your thougts. Again, what I did was use your logic/reasoning to apply in different manner. That's not putting words in your mouth or anything remotely like that.

To answer your other question...not many VPs (would never expect to get an email back from a VP of a huge corporation...one with 15 employees then maybe. Knowing that do you think my point about his refusing to have my original email included with his response is still valid?

1
Jul 24, 2009 02:39PM
1
Jul 24, 2009 02:46PM
2
Jul 24, 2009 04:20PM
1
Jul 24, 2009 04:32PM
3
Jul 24, 2009 04:43PM
2
Jul 24, 2009 06:59PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply