There's no need to refute your argument. Why should there be outrage...the joke surrounding Boyers and the airline was a joke. Rest of the stuff is as valid as any "hostile take over by BOW"...The scenarios I presented and the hostile take over scenario can both be supported by hypotheticals and suppositions. The whole "make up a bunch of hypotheticals and when/if one of them comes true you can say 'see I told you so'" is not something that adds value, IMO.

Last post on this...i'll go back to my lurking and posting every once and a while position.