"I would have been much fairer...as I'm sure many investors on this board would also have been...8% was good then...Sure would have beaten 20%!"

You have a lack of understanding risk....at the time 8% was CD rates....you're saying you would have risked your funds with e.Digital @ 8%?

Not me, it would have been CD for me.....a company like e.Digital, high risk, over double.

Heck, look at what Buffet is charging GE and GoldmanSacks.....almost 11% when the rates of CD are 2....lol

He considers them high risk and they are paying it.

doni