Free
Message: Re: richardo - skreal
4
Jun 10, 2009 06:41PM
2
Jun 10, 2009 07:20PM
3
Jun 10, 2009 07:57PM
7
Jun 10, 2009 08:08PM
1
Jun 10, 2009 08:48PM
1
Jun 10, 2009 09:53PM
2
Jun 10, 2009 10:37PM
1
Jun 11, 2009 12:21AM

Jun 11, 2009 01:30AM
7
Jun 11, 2009 03:48AM
4
Jun 11, 2009 04:14AM
3
Jun 11, 2009 04:19AM
2
Jun 11, 2009 04:39AM
5
Jun 11, 2009 04:46AM
4
Jun 11, 2009 04:58AM

Jun 11, 2009 05:13AM
3
Jun 11, 2009 05:43AM
1
Jun 11, 2009 05:45AM

Jun 11, 2009 05:47AM
12
Jun 11, 2009 05:50AM
2
Jun 11, 2009 05:54AM
7
Jun 11, 2009 06:00AM
1
Jun 11, 2009 06:03AM
8
Jun 11, 2009 06:33AM
5
Jun 11, 2009 06:37AM
5
Jun 11, 2009 07:39AM

Jun 11, 2009 08:18AM
4
Jun 11, 2009 08:25AM
2
Jun 11, 2009 01:06PM
2
Jun 11, 2009 02:13PM
1
Jun 11, 2009 02:20PM
2
Jun 11, 2009 02:29PM
2
Jun 11, 2009 02:43PM

Re: richardo - skreal

posted on Jun 11, 2009 03:57PM

It would seem that anyone placed on the board would be under the same constraints. Their responsibility would be to the welfare of the company, not to keeping shareholders informed.

Coyote

14
Jun 11, 2009 04:55PM
2
Jun 11, 2009 05:43PM
6
Jun 11, 2009 09:08PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply