I have no problem with questions.....that is what this board is supposed to be about.

As to your question, you keep referring to the removal of 445 and 108 as being a lose of claim.....there was no lose of claim......445 and 108 are not being challenged in this case.....they're being dismissed.

"My concern is whether having, effectively, lost the claim on infringement of 445 and 108 as a result of the dismissal with prejudice, sets a precedent that diminishes the potential for success in pursuing infringement by other companies unrelated to Samsung."

The only question is, why was the dismissal so aggressive?

doni