Free
Message: Re: RP email today
14
Apr 16, 2009 02:23PM

"This was done to streamline this case and does not affect the number of products that we’re accusing of using our IP or the amount in damages we are seeking."

They streamlined the case at the courts order.....

Why was the language paramount to closing the door on 445 and 108 altogether? I can see having the claims count abbreviated....but why give up the rights to future actions?

They did more than streamline the case...

doni


1
Apr 16, 2009 02:36PM
2
Apr 16, 2009 02:39PM
5
Apr 16, 2009 02:44PM
2
Apr 16, 2009 02:53PM

Apr 16, 2009 03:00PM

Apr 16, 2009 03:07PM
7
Apr 16, 2009 03:26PM
1
Apr 16, 2009 03:32PM

Apr 16, 2009 05:13PM

Apr 16, 2009 05:14PM
4
Apr 17, 2009 05:37AM

Apr 17, 2009 05:46AM
2
Apr 17, 2009 06:07AM

Apr 17, 2009 06:15AM
1
Apr 17, 2009 06:36AM
1
Apr 17, 2009 08:04AM
2
Apr 17, 2009 08:54AM
4
Apr 23, 2009 01:30PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply