I have no desire to get into it with RP, I understand the meaning he gives to those that do, I'm not invested(not totally meaning my holdings) in his responses.

I'm simply making and stating my observations.

The dialog here keeps the mind open and not specifically centered on a linear path, observations stimulate the dialog.

Most all in life happens in the peripheral border, and when it comes to this company, it's all in the peripheral and not totally to what they communicate.

I know you are a numbers guy, or form of bean counter(I'm not being arrogant) where, for you, numbers tell the story. Same for LL, where his teachings are that convoluted rules tell the story, however, for me it's different. I can understand where both of you are coming from and it's hard for each of you to understand where I'm coming from.

With that, where I'm coming from may, or or may not happen to the degree I consider it should....we have a little glimpse of a "could be" and I'm most glad of that.

There is a reason that I'm here and not in MSFT, APPLE, or you name it, where it all relates to my past studies of data issues. There is a finite way of laying them out....where they have a patented method in that finite world.

RP can not answer questions for me because for now it's all in the peripheral and he does not have the answers.

IMO, Polis is gambling on the peripheral and he does not have the answers.

The ultimate dilemma.

doni