Free
Message: Re: Someone...doni...
1
Dec 10, 2008 02:48PM
2
Dec 10, 2008 03:19PM

Dec 10, 2008 03:28PM

Dec 10, 2008 03:35PM

Dec 10, 2008 03:56PM

Dec 10, 2008 04:28PM
1
Dec 10, 2008 04:38PM

Dec 11, 2008 06:39AM

Dec 11, 2008 07:17AM

"If these are true, then there is no "Wedge" to be driven between the zeros and ones that form a picture, and those that end up as a song, or Obama's speech, is there?..."

The processes are normally stand alone issues, for the audio and video. Separate files are stored in a basket file, such as .avi. Remember that issue as it related to the DigEcor DRM agreement? The files are stored separate and homogeneous and brought together.

e.Digital has the ability to store files non homogeneously

That aside...we apparently have a case regarding audio, however,

If a video process is generated from a flash directly, NAND in particular, and you remove a modular unit where the file(files) stop execution, do we have a case against this video process?

IMO, not straight out like the audio, IMO, we would need some form of ruling pushing us into video for a consideration of infringement involving the initial patents....Keep in mind, there is an audio in this video process being executed....might we have a case regarding the audio when the flash is removed stopping its execution, no matter what the signal order is between the two?

doni
















Dec 11, 2008 10:31AM

Dec 11, 2008 10:36AM

Dec 11, 2008 10:47AM

Dec 11, 2008 11:27AM

Dec 11, 2008 12:24PM
3
Dec 12, 2008 03:57AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply