Well you better hope that there is in fact some form of franchise consideration going forward that monopolizes....because LG is going to establish the value of your investment.

If they set their franchise too low....you lose and they lose

Because the dilution of tech will set in quickly.....3 years

For the past 30 years the methods to format and organize data have been the UNIX types, or the more enterprise MSFT types. There's a big difference between the two. Unix organizes through massive inode pointers to put everything in prospective, with that, the massive pointers(overhead) grow as data grows. For Msft they incorporate link-list structures that cut down on the growth of overhead, however, there are still directives initiated from FAT or file allocation tables where the allocation pointers grows.

Both systems have an overhead burden along with a maintenance problem that must keep the directive structures up to date as they grow.

e.Digitals methods do not utilize any of the formats above.

You can only organize data in a very limited number of ways. It's patented and in my opinion, there will not be much to come behind it for some time.

This digital format with API, drives a serial NAND memory matrix as an emulated working RAM process and does not have to take care of directive structures.

Why NAND? Because it is the cheapest to develop and manufacture, however, it has a draw back as a serial structure. For normal integrators needing advanced utility, it requires additional conditions over a parallel structure(NOR).

e.Digitals patents suit a serial process without problems....and they take advantage of the cheap memory offering giving utility as NOR.

If you give thought to the NAND and why?....what is the value in that?

Everything you consider when it comes to e.Digitals tech comes full circle to saving.

doni