The pundits who run at the mouth impugning the integrity of RP here, know not of what they are taking about...

It easy to say here that what RP says comes what a boulder of SALT ROCK attached to it!...Well countries have fought wars for a some rock salt; India broke the back of the British Empire over the people damanding rights to some salt...Lol...Lol...

What is important to understand is when Nanully and Putnam say they have attended many meetings with DM and defendants they are absolutely correct in that they are following a format which Nanully perfected while putting the PTSC case together...

Specifically:...

1) You file some cpmplaints to get it out there that you are serious about enforcing your PATENTS. Then...

2) You prepare a portfolio essentially stating your case, and send it out to as many of the 174 "Identified potentail infringers" as possible.

3) You classify the responses you receive in catagories of (a) The heck with you; (b) let's meet and look at your power point, (ergo Nanully showing them by unplugging the FLASH card!?), (c) lets talk about licensing and settlement.

4) Also, any of the known 8 defendants, (soon to be 10), have to go through the mandatory Court "Settlement" process, including "Mediation, JAMS settlement negotiations, Court supervised settlemnt conferences, etc.", all of which require the presence of legally responsible representative of each party...

Therefore, anyone who second guesses the statements by RP and Nanully don't know what they are talking about, and have the objective of Bashing the two and the company. We have seen enough of this in the past, and I say it is nonsense...

Enough is Enough...

GLTA...

Gil...