I have no interest in engaging in a tit-for-tat approach of dealing with issues with any one, especially you...

However, I implore you to grow up and discard your one dimential appraoch to adressing issues raised by others on this baord...

You first decide how "negative you want to be" then you selectively state facts to support your position...

For example, as to the tie up between the growth in the personnel of DM and their relationship with EDIG, I used data that was posted here by RICHARD without questioning it in detail. Becasue I beleieve OZ and his veracity...

You, on the other hand did some, LEAXUS-NEXUS (for whom you worked), research to show that DM had a merger with a WEST COAST law firm in 2006, and made the "LEAP OF FAITH" statement that the tripling of the size of DM had no relation to their connection with EDIG...

This is a sophomoric approach to dialogue and not a constructive method of promoting a healthy discussion of what is taking place with respect to EDIG prospects. Your continuous bashhing approach in indeed getting very "booooring."

Whta follows is from Wikipedia. Edig history replete with foot notes... Look it over, read the foot notes, then write convincing me and the rest on this board that you have some special knowledge that confirms the tripling of DM size had nothing to do with their knowing about being connected with the 50% "TAKE" they were about to make on their investment by getting a "Lien" on EDIG PATENTS?!

WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE:

"Intellectual Property"

"e.Digital owns 5 patents which it refers to as its Flash-R™ patent portfolio.[17] The company has made licensing of its patented "MicroOS" flash file system, also called the "Norris Flash File Systerm" or "NFFS,"[18][19][20] a priority since 1997. Despite a lack of success, the company claims that its patent holdings relating to flash memory are "fundamental and valuable, particularly in the areas of content file management, optimal flash memory management, and in removable flash applications."

In February 2006, e.Digital announced that it was pursuing "monetization" of its patent portfolio.[21] It engaged Pat Nunally, formerly of Patriot Scientific Corporation, as an Intellectual Property (IP) consultant in June 2006.[22]

On December 21, 2006 the company stated to shareholders that they had "identified 174 companies with 1,372 products that appear to employ our patent portfolio." [23] On December 20, 2007 it further expanded its claim by stating: “To date, we have identified annual U.S. revenues of more than $20 billion from what we believe are infringing products from such companies."[24]

In March 2007 the company engaged the law firm of Duane Morris LLP to pursue patent infringement claims on a contingent fee basis. The agreement grants Duane Morris 40 - 50% of all settlements and awards after full reimbursement for expenses incurred.[25] The contigency fee agreement also provides a lien resulting in e.Digital's patents being officially assigned to Duane Morris.[26]

[edit] e. Digital Corp vs. Vivitar Corporation

The company's first lawsuit for infringement of its patents was filed against Vivitar Corporation on September 7, 2007 in the Marshall Division, Eastern District of Texas. [27][28]"...

GLTA...

Gil...