sam, he didn't know that judgements could be rendered based on the entire market value of the product and led us to believe EDIG's piece would be very small by taking his usual negative stance, until I posted this article that indicated possibilities otherwise.

Has he ever repeated it?  No. Fair and balanced, not.

Now with $25 Billion identified by Nunally and DM, the bar was raised in our favor.

The significance of that has not yet sunk in, imo.  I'll leave it to DM and EDIG to make the case but at least we are aware and informed.