Such fees could be large (I believe LL suggested $80K), or very small (even zero). Arbitration is not anything like a trial.... Anything is admissable, your opponent doesn`t have to be privy to evidence prior, etc. So the court rules (which are why most people engage a lawyer) don`t apply, and all of this is why arbitration is the ``preferred`` way to resolve disputes - no lawyers ``required``. It is possible that EDIG had little or no use of lawyers in this matter. An astute business person could handle it (I`ve represented people in arbitration). This may also explain the pre-arbitration settlement, and on ``low ball`` terms. IMO, the lawyer fees, if existent, were probably very small, allowing EDIG to pocket the booty.

But I KNOW nuttin`!

SGE