Once again you are demonstrating your ignorance of the actual importance of having the best "Trial Attorney" who has a knowledge and experience in impanelling a jury, and presenting the case to the jury in a way it will end up with a win...

The first time you did this was when you arrogantly insulted all the juries in Eastern District by stating the following:...

"I would have to strongly disagree that the average potential jury member has ever even heard of flash technology and, though most own cell phones, certainly do not know much more than that about handhelds.  This is especially true if you are in Tyler, Texas, as opposed to NYC."(see, your knee jerk response of 9/07 to post)...

DM has has brought "Woody" as "Of Counsel" in this case for the simple reason that they want the "Best Trial Lawyer" with a great track record to help with a "WIN" strategy in this case. Otherwise, they would have stayed with other listed counsel only...

The rest of your commentry is meaningless to me and confirms that you have a lot of "growing up to do"...

GLTA...

Gil...