LL, SS posts facts, cut and pastes, which are verifiable, to support his position while yours is a bit different, and while you lend a different perspective, your carrying on and on again, adds nothing of value.

EDIG focused investors on many consumer electronic product categories and they are wise to understand that most, if not all of those categories have generated huge revenues over time.

The most recent post was a reminder of just one of many product categories that are alive and well and which might just fall into the cross hairs for DM and Pat Nunally...but you can ignore management's directives and bloat on about a court case...which adds great value to investors,n lol, since it is your opinion.