"If there is any hint of a conflict of interest they have to give up representation of one party."

I'm sure, after looking at Pat Nunally's due diligence, and before taking the case on a contingency basis, DM took that into consideration, as did EDIG.

As for conflicts, EDIG has been dealing with more than one IP law firm and surely could split up their efforts on a case by case review. What's the big deal?