He can use infringers, but technically they are "potential infringers" until the court decides any single one in our favor. I choose to use the term "potential infringers.

And likewise I respect your posts and opinions, but you tell me why every time I post DB somehow takes a word, a sentence, and tries to spin it according to his like.

Go back and read my original post and tell me what was inappropriate. It had positive statements and LL liked the tone as well. Try not taking the side of db on every issue, use your lawyer attributes and then tell me if db ever embellishes anything concerning edig. I happen to believe he does, and that is where it all started with that particular word. A small but difference of opinion and I have mine as to how I perceive him.

I stated:..." Tell me how many of the 174 "potential" infringers you think we will see a ruling in our favor? I think many would be overwhelmed if we win 25% of the total, of course if we embellish the number we may win all 174 identified infringers; I guess that would be more realistic according to you."...

Do you disagree with the above comment or do you really think we will win a total of 174 cases?

OZ