assuming the companies that edig has worked with in the past did actually rip-off edig tech./patent (as many here believe) ; I believe edig with the help of PN and DM will have a great head start versus the likes of PTSC and their IP licensing. Simply because edig will know where to look and show the proof to the Infringing companies via DM.

Oh, by the way edig did actually have several products out, which might make a difference in a lawsuit.

Having blatant proof of IP infringement (IMO) should convince at least a few companies to license or settle. Perhaps edigital can do "early mover" licensing.

Does anyone else see my logic or am I way off base?

I agree with some of you that things will move faster for edig than PTSC. I don't think we will have to wait as long as PTSC for some results.

At these prices, I have plans to add when the funds are available.

GLTA

Tom