Again you have have quite succintely and in language I can completely understand what "really" transpired from the Judge's ruling here. I thank you and I laud you.

In jumping to other boards and reading Cass(what's her name) I see where her opinion of the Judge's statements and ruling's are completely negative toward whether or not EDig came out of this on the winning or losing side. I invite anyone to read her very duplicitous comments where she conveniently glosses over the fact that the NDA agreements that allow BOW 7 years of exclusivity ARE ONLY FOR THE DRM SIGNED IN THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT.

EDig says ''''GREAT"""... Have at it BOW. WE ARE NO LONGER USING THAT DRM.....THEREFORE WE ARE NOT BOUND BY THAT AGREEMENT. WE ARE USING OUR NEW PRODUCT ....the eVu.....This all stated by Mr. Eagle in a very clear way that even Ms Cass can understand. But of course it will not be.