ASSUME all you want...perfect and true to form.

As for you mistress, I rarely read her posts as I have found them to be consistently and wildly biased against the company and its investors, at least those smart enough to recognize her purpose for being here. It amounts to story telling with the intent to take investors down her dark path and not focus on what will make this investment work.  In your case, her strategy appears to be working.

What I'd like to know, since we are diagloging, is why you are so enthralled with her anti-EDIG perspective and fail to call her out on areas that other investors have recently noted. She is best ignored and I don't plan on taking this discussion much further.  In fact, this is exactly what she wants to accomplish, turning shareholder against shareholder along with shareholder against the company.

Your efforts are counter productive to your own cause, it would seem.  If you still own shares it would stand to reason you would want them to appreciate in value, yet I see you defending a obvious FUDster, one that might just be working for those off shore accounts.