knows that if you are lucky maybe the initial meeting with your prospective counsel could be free, but after that anything from a phone call on there would be a fee.

Now legal representation on a contingency basis that I have not a clue.

Why would edig go to the trouble of making a false statement regarding legal updates on patents infringement, to appease shareholders? At this point I don't think so, when has edig tried to please shareholders with false news since WB signed on? Why would somenone like Pat Nunally work with edig? Does anyone what his compensation has been so far?

IMO, edig real chance of being a bona fide transitional company from an OTC to NAS/AMEX will come not from selling eVU's but from patent infringement.

Most here believed in edig because of the PATENTS, and have invested great sums of money (albeit, gamble/otc stock) in hopes of a company with a potential of a industry standard "type" licensing. Why has edig in the past work with co's like intc, etc.? Had edig not have some respectable members on BOD in the past?

The reason I point these out, as most here know better than I that edig does have something that is special, and with great potential. If edig is half as lucky as an ptsc the potential could be lucrative. I do not want to miss this party if and when it happens.

I have hopes that edig will be a company to be reckoend with, and will continue to add shares to my portfolio as long as edig coninues to show that they are doing what they can to pursue patent infringers.

Of course all in my Hopeful opinion.

GLTA

Tom