No such message found

Free
Message: RE: Pat Nunally has to have played a role - Legal Eagle/ If you think about...

RE: Pat Nunally has to have played a role - Legal Eagle/ If you think about...

posted on Sep 18, 2006 11:04AM

what data a big league law firm would be looking at to consider EDIG`s fight, you gotta figure they checked the check book and the pulse of the company. If they believe in EDIG`s case and take it on a ``pay for results`` basis; they have to believe EDIG will be around long enough to collect on EDIG`s patent rights.

In other words, the legal side must believe EDIG will be around to collect. Wrong? Comments welcome?

John

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply