Thanks for the clarification.
``e.Digital is asserting that the 10/657,822 APS/digEcor patent application was filed without its consent or knowledge using e.Digital’s documents and containing e.Digital’s proprietary intellectual property. e.Digital is requesting that the USPTO declare e.Digital the inventor and that it be awarded the patent rights to this key technology. e.Digital is also evaluating other actions it may take regarding this matter.``
It sounded to me that this went beyond a mere contractual issue, but rather digecor`s use and claiming of EDIG` IP.
I`ll have to reread your comments.
