``And doesn`t infriengment imply past-tense much more than future intention.``
Not really...
Actel PROasic is past....leading developments to Igloo being future.
IMO...it`s more important for investors and the future of a technology.
Unlike PTSC....they`re looking to past infringement for the bulk of royalty.
IMO...ten years too late, with the payoff being much less to the owners/investors than it could have been.
Why is that?
doni
