RE: jhawk: / peterweb
posted on
Jul 27, 2006 08:49AM
You know, as well as I do, that the company, at times, has far overstepped bounds in PRs, as well as direct, attributable statements. I can see where shareholders could be at least skeptical, if not downright unhappy.
That is your opinion. I would agree on some PR statements and probably not agree with you on others.
I have no problem with fact based comments that are negative. They are posted here on a regular basis, but many choose not to see that forest for all of those darn trees.
If you have read this board, you would know what I thought about Jim Collier and ole Fred`s ability to negotiate a deal with Big Box retail. They were WAY out of their league and I not only posted it, I called both of them as I know more than a little bit about selling to these accounts and producing OEM container programs. Even today, I believe (and have previously posted) that FF is the highest paid Administrative Assistant in the world based on what we have been told he does and what he no longer does. IMO, it is not enough of an issue to rant any further. It is Willy`s ball now. Let`s see who comes to play in his sandbox.
Results do matter. I believe many here our looking for more positive results in the next few months and certainly by the end of the calander year. We`ll see. EDIG has never operated on my time line.
We can whine about it, or move on to the next project which may have promise. I choose to keep the whinning to a minimum and see what is possible with this speculative penny stock.
Someone(Who?) once posted ``Know what you own.`` How true.
John