Now that was a good post. So, let`s stick to rants...

The cyber world is full of all types of folks. It is a reader beware kinda place. If you read enough posts from a specific poster you do get a sense of their goals. There is nothing wrong with stated goals. I don`t think DaBoss is doing anything other than what he believes is right by posting only positives. I also think Cassie has the right to post only negatives. It is the personal attacks that need to be thrown out. As Paul has posted many times, ``Attack the post, not the poster.`` I couldn`t agree more.

The Agoracom boards have long been the place where bashers are not welcome. There is a difference between bashing and posting a negative comment which is backed by some level of intelligent support, right or wrong.

Those that believe they were conned by EDIG management should prove it in a court of law or shut the hell up, IMO. Their posts are just rantings about a poor personal decision with no personal responsibility. My guess is these are the same people who believe the government ``owes`` them something and probably use pharses like, ``Would you like fries with that?`` on a regular basis -- cyber world`s equivilent to Trailer Trash.

As for EDIG, I doubt it is a big secret that the company needs a consistent revenue stream. The company has been in this same spot for years. However, today the circumstances are different and EDIG`s markets are different. No one KNOWS the what or when of EDIG`s future. It is all speculation. It is possible EDIG has IP patents worth something. The converse is also possible. Most of the long time shareholders fall into two broad camps -- 1) those that have given up and don`t want to take their lumps and sell (see most of the other EDIG boards); and 2) those that believe there is a chance the pps will recover to a resonable point(Agoracom).

EDIG is a specualtive penny stock. IMO, everyone should have an exit strategy. That`s how money is made.

John