As for this comment:

``Also, when your ``error`` was pointed out, you did not acknowledge it.``

I don`t feel obligated to answer to you or anyone else, especially those whose interests are agenda driven with an anti-EDIG/anti-EDIG investor slant.

Your ``claims`` of my motives are hardly worth noting as I made my points by giving sources and providing direct cut and pastes.

I won`t bother looking back to argue this anymore as your points and accusations are Much Ado About Nothing.