And sure it`s worth discussing - it`s a good development and I`m happy about it. But discussion requires thought and substance, not repeating the same stuff over and over and over again. We can read, most can comprehend, and all can remember for more than an hour or two (or a second or two).

I`m just asking that that you avoid the repeats. Evidence? Look at your post #483409. Why? Just posted by iamfriendly, and you repost in the very next message, with the (totally unnecessary) demonstration of your highlighting skills. Yup, that`s what I call ``discussion``.

Looking forward to substance and real discussion. However, in this instance, IMO it has been adequately discussed based on everything we currently KNOW.

SGE