As for bad mouthing a former customer; I don`t recall EVER seeing EDIG bad mouth digEcor/Wencor in the press (at least not until this recent attack - and it was a reasoned, rational response, not bad-mouthing). However, digEcor didn`t hesitate to bad mouth EDIG in the press multiple times - citing delivery and quality problems, the latter being unfounded IMO based on prior press stating that there were virtually no quality problems. So, as for bad-mouthing, your premise works both ways. To potential suppliers to digEcor, they now KNOW that if they do business with digEcor and don`t happily give in to everthing, EVERYTHING, that digEcor wants, they`ll get hammered by any (manufactured) means available. This may be one reason that digEcor is going to (supposedly) do manufacturing in-house - potential suppliers don`t want to play.

Was EDIG bad-mouthing digEcor when they turned over IFE and AMTRAK business to them?

To repeat the prior post key question: why did digEcor make a final direct payment to Maycom after sending a rep to discover that (supposedly) no digEs had been produced? And why is digEcor filing suit based on contracts no longer in effect? And here`s some new ones: where`s Bill Boyer, and why? Why isn`t IMS working with digEcor? Why does EDIG have an independent customer for IFE, when digEcor was the ``expert`` - having the best portable IFE a year ago?

Please provide a reasonable response to these questions as I`d really like to KNOW the answers, cuz I KNOW nuttin`!

SGE