Thankyou for that detailed analysis of sp as it pertains to when you buy in. So basically you're saying that people who buy shares years apart, get different deals. I had no idea. So the 2004 ...$124 Nortel guy got a different deal than the 2009 ten cent guy. Wow.....who would ever have guessed that's how it works. This is revolutionary...it could change the entire stock market if word gets out.

You're exactly right that the people the people that jumped in, in 2007 did so just as the DYA ship was sinking. I suppose that huge risk that they took doesn't deserve anything extra, like warrants. They probably just wanted to throw their money down the toilet. Oddly...that Millions in cash infusion managed to save the company from going down, along with the investments from the earlier shareholders. Not just the $2.00 guys...but the 5 cent guys too. OH....YA...there's 5 cent guys!

Just using your math here.....lemme see now........the "bailout risk taking warrant sucking dudes" that paid over 20......are in the hole as well. Meanwhile the 5 cent guys are up over 100%.....and when the "Bailout scum bag warrant guys" get to break even the 5 cent guys will be basking in fourfold profit land. Gotcha...now I get it! We're supposed to despise all those who get in lower than what you paid.....and pity (or at least pretend to) all the guys who paid more. That's good, I like that. How much did you pay by the way....just so we can all slot you into the right category. Since you only showed up a week ago, you're in the 8 cent range.

As for you Gerry.....sorry.....all of the millions that you poured into this company, and all of the hard work that you have done trying to make this thing go. It's all forgotten now, because you have been put on record as worrying only about your warrants. And you have been called out to put your money where your mouth is and your morals have been questioned. Not by me! By the new guy. The guy that talks like an old guy with a different name. The guy that said all that stuff earlier, and didn't get any notification....nor flags on his post......so he obviously didn't violate any rules. In fact he got a bunch of recommendations. It must be a popular opinion. Then again....probably just votes from his other names. I carefully crafted my post to stay on the same topic. Since the rules have become very fuzzy lately. I am still patiently waiting for an explanation regarding the incident last week.

Thanks again for opening up and clarifying how life and the market works.