1. from your url citation, dated oct17/16:--from Business Insider"

""But its real-world application so far has been limited by the high cost associated with producing it.

"The reason we are not using it yet, even though the material is not a new one, is that there is "no mass production for it yet that can show reasonable cost and scalability," Gauchia explained."

But Fisker told Business Insider that his battery division, Fisker Nanotech, was patenting a machine that he said could produce as much as 1,000 kilograms of graphene at a cost of just 10 cents a kilogram.

Jack Kavanaugh, the head of Fisker Nanotech, also told Business Insider the machine could "feasibly"produce 1,000 kilograms of graphene."

Its a hyperbole laced set of unproven, untested, un patented marketing claims, as admitted by the promoters' executives. 

Zip proof, and nobody is referring to it.

Peter