the addition to concrete is so huge it's hard to believe.

billions of tons used a year. plus, since 30% less strengthened concrete is needed as regular concrete, the strengthened concrete is actually LESS expensive to use! you can work the numbers yourself to see this is true. what that means is there's no reason not to use the strengthened concrete instead of the regular concrete. and that's using $60,000 as the retail price per ton. there's such a small percentage of graphene used used to strengthen the concrete, that it's largely price insensitive from the start.

there's nothing but upside here. BG university tested ZEN's graphene from its graphite to get its stellar results. presumably then, only ZEN's graphite will strengthen the concrete to this degree. other graphite will deliver lesser results.

how much graphene would be needed per years at 4 billion tons of concrete a year? if 0.0005 of a ton is the correct number, you'd need 2 million tons of ZEN's graphene a year. from what i've read so far, we can only produce about 100k tons per year at best. supposedly 98k tons is the useable graphene that we'd net from that kind of production.

forget batteries! how can we satisfy demand from concrete additive alone? how much more would suppliers have to charge than $60,000 a ton to bring demand in line to what can be producted? what percentage of that price could zenyatta get? would we really settle for $7,500 a ton?

it looks to me like nothing but the concrete industry could afford to pay what ZEN's graphite would be worth to them. nobody else could afford to pay what the concrete industry could pay. and their concrete would still be cheaper than regular concrete in the process!

just wait until the concrete industry finds out how much they really need ZEN's graphite.