I saw Charlie's post, and must say I am continuing to probe for answers to some of them for myself. We all should be doing the same.

To me it is not about allowing or not allowing posts that pose valid questions. But there is nothing new in the whole post. They have now taken to bashing Dr. Charar? Really? So ets go over the concerns. But please note that the analysis of ZEN must be taken in context with other high purity graphite companies who will havfe to deal with the same secretive market.

Purity - various releaes covered this including the Sept release which specifically adreesed bashers sulpher issues. They have stated we have high purity with insignificicant amounts of impurities. This does not have to be re-stated each month. Strangely, last year, CCB had a release stating that had a result of over 100% purity yet no one bashed them? Even more oddly, CCB is now saying to get to the highest purity they may have to use caustic bake..heaven forbid.. Purity is a KNOWN will ZEN.

ND's are not significant - really? So it does not matter if we have zero or 25 end users signed to one. I don't even think that requires any further comment.

PEA is one year late - well, it is 7.5 months late, not one year. Reasons have been given, like them or not but bringing this up for discussion brings nothing new to the forum. We here all no it is behind schedule. The flow sheet is the big open question and it has been debated a lot here.

Flotation %age - early corporate presentations showed 80%, now they stated 78%, big deal. Non starter. From the very outset they said the most likely path was flotation and caustic bake. They haveit now over 92% and that it is the number used in takeNotes spreadsheet was the assummed number they would get to.

"Missing Data" - every company's releases could be gone over with a fine tooth comb and torn apart. It does not happen because every compnay does not have a designated band to do such work. I guarantee that if someone had the time they could do the same with the CCB releases. But why bother? We have no beef with them. remember when there was suddenly a sulpher issue? But alas, this was proven false. Remember when there was this sudden OMG moment where certian posters said there was huge gaps in testing proticol..OMG....report them to the securities commission...all nonsense. Would we all like to see more data? Absolutely. But the Company has chosen a specific path to get to their goal. Many disagree with the path and many choose to ignore the path taken and focus on the end game. No action taken against the company, no retractions of news releases, etc. All above board.

Charlie's post brought no 'new' issue or questions up that have not been discussed before.