TidalPool,

first, thank you for some great insights with some of your recent posts.

i was never a member of TCC, but it does seem strange the way chief flip flops. i thought he had a good excuse the first time when he said that he misinterpreted the size of the deposit and panic sold on one report. but if he's doing it again, is he giving any reasons why?

he's the one that sold me on ZEN in the first place. his posts convinced me to look into it more. i should have listened more closely to EVA on SI. she brought it up first but i was too busy with other things to investigate.

then i started reading hoov's and threshold's comments on ZEN and decided to buy. after that i saw 4 0r 5 other posters with good insights, such as yourself. so while i can thank chief for getting into ZEN, it has been others that have helped me to understand it better. but chief reads these guys too.. he's known them for longer than i have. i don't know why he's wobbling here.

here's another thing about TCC. it's good that they have members that do research on stocks and share with each other to build a knowledge base. then they can give themselves time to buy up a stock in relative secrecy. but why keep the secrecy after everyone has bought? isn't then to their advantage to have everyone know as much good news about the stock as possible? long after they're out promoting a stock they keep other good news hidden. i suppose they think there's another good buying opportunity with more good news and they want members to have the opportunity to buy more. but most are full up to the gills. it seems the majority would benefit by loudly announcing any good news from the moment they decide to start promoting a stock.

anyway, i'd like to know what his claimed reason is for turning against ZEN now. the guesses about his motivations may be accurate, but i'd still like to know what his claims are. thanks.