You have both commented but from different ends of the balance. I'll claim the midpoint fulcrum.

Firstly, I am still holding WTG and have infact taken advantage of the recent share price depression. Generally stated I do not respect the capabilities of Daniel Major and how he has handled this company nor do I respect the arrogance and capabilities of Max Finskiy for the way he has allowed this company to falter whether you think in terms of WTG or CMM.

However, I do respect the gold ore asset in the mines and the potential for growth and appreciation of the share price and value of the asset once effective management is in place.

We all have a retrospective of events that have accumulated. What I am commenting on is what are these events telling us? My comments are based on my accumulated opinions. Just because I indicate an opinion whereby I believe that Daniel Major et. al are not doing a good job does not mean that I am "bashing" them. I am expressing an opinion that they are not doing the job for which they are being paid for.

I observe many who post homemade data not based only on facts originating from the company. This approach is us just playing mind games amongst ourselves. Example.... IF we mine X Tonnes,/day and Y grade, and do it for Z days and the price of gold is $A, then we should show a profit but if gold drops to B$ and and the grade changes to C and we assume that they've been stockpiling D tonnes for the past E days and the recovery cost per ounce if F....and it goes on and on. We are misleading ourselves, and taking the focus off of Daniel Major et al.

I'm going to cite an example of a company that took a severe hit in the market today (March 28) that has been exemplary for keeping its shareholders informed. The company is Scorpio Mining a silver/gold producer in Mexico and Nevada. From the very outset of this companies inception they have kept shareholders appraised on exactly what is happening and what they are doing. Unfortunately, today they had to inform their shareholder that the resource in their flagship mine may not be continuous...... and the share price dropped 20+ %. The difference between SPM and WTG/CMM is that SPM has a track record of trust, openness and transparency. Their Management tells shareholders as it is. I trust them. They are a class act and it is a pleasure to be a part of this company. I am confident that they will solve this problem.

But.... let's look at WTG/CMM. Can we say the same of Daniel Major and his Management team. Others have commented on the "flakiness" of their news releases. I have tried for a few weeks to contact Joanna Longo to get a transcript of Major's PDAC presentation. Her email is bounced back each time, Her phone contact is non-descript and no calls have been returned. The WTG website only gives one general email address under contact us with no other emails or phone numbers. Even their physical address is missing.

I think that it is a fair assumption that other WTG holders also hold companies that are a class act. We have the right to expect this of WTG Management.

These posts amongst us should be likened to standing before a "microphone" at a continous shareholder's meeting. What would I want to say to Daniel Major and Max Finskiy face to face if they were open to listening which they have proven themselves not to be. Would I want to be second guessing their mining activities or would I want to discuss their lack of results for which they are being handsomely paid while my share price valuations are continually falling.

So I do not consider my attempts to get a strong message to them as "bashing". I consider it to be my right to protect my interests.

But OF....... I've got to look up "promulgate" That is a new one for me. Thank you.

I trust that I answered the reasons for my methodology of approach to WTG Management.