The first I heard of it was a month ago or so via emit who heard it on another board.  I recently spoke to someone at the company that said it is an SEC rule to try to keep manipulators from doing exactly what may be going on with Unxl.  Clearly if a company had no cash, no contracts, a bunch of debt etc. it could go to zero, however we have $6 million in the bank, 28 contracts, half of which are in the manufacturing phase, and no debt.  This rule is meant to protect against this exact occurrance, as I understand it.  It is also my understanding that they have an idea as to who is doing it and at least one fed up large investor who has also put clients into the stock has compiled voluminous amounts in information for the authorities to view.  Maybe it is legal, maybe not, we are going to have to see.  IMO, the company fundamentals and leadership are solid, they just have to weather this financial storm.  They have three potential partnerships in various stages of being worked on,  later this month Jeff will be in China for the Computex convention and to conduct business related to the potential partnerships and they are one of only three companies in the world with this type of technology and are the only one that is a stand alone company that solely deals with the tech, the other two are small parts of much larger companies, ie, the only "pure play"  which has been mentioned several times by the company.  It seems to me that the stock price is not going down because the company is under performing but that those pulling the market strings want to accumulate as much common stock as they can at the lowest price they can--as Sgt. Shultz would say " I know nothing"