Scanning the other board, you see some real pieces of work over there .... Unique characters, the claims of paid bashers ... it is quite a hodge podge of methods ....

There remains IMO a question or two about the process, some definiton of what will constitute the "best" interest of the shareholders ... without clarification around the selection criteria ... I can accept not knowing the final outcome but the absence of criteria of what is defined as in the best interests of the shareholders being left up solely to the discretion of managment and we as chareholders giving them the authority to proceed without limitation is not acceptable to me.

What are the thoughts of some of you ... is this an area of concern ... if not why?

Orgy