I see one of those I believe to be part of a network of sophisticated bashers is acknowledging in a very grudging way the possibility that UBS could be good for a "gambler" (I guess anyone who enters the market like say even Bear Stearns "gamblers" fall in this category) and even suggested a price ... of course he unlike everyone else who he questions doesn't have to say how he got his number ... after all he is the voice of reason and unlike everyone else who can make comments he doesn't need to explain himself to the "pheasants".

pretty interesting the double standard he allows himself to have while insisting explanations need to be provided by other posters.

just an observation of course on my part.

Orgy