A Note on JP's Answer and How It Might Not Have Been The Best Fit For Tyhee:

Jim Puplava's answer to my Q-Call would have been, for me, spot on perfect if he hadn't translated my words,"bankable economic study", to mean "Feasibility study". That was my fault, I should have just said Pre-Feasibility Study. But, I didn't. And so JP used the Minefinders example, via a vis it's Feasibility Study, to show why the share price of such a go-it-alone into production company would go higher than a junior that would be bought out in the next year.

But here's the fun part of this confusion I created: Tyhee promises to deliver a bankable economic study (albeit, a Pre-Feasibility/aka, not a Feasibility Study) sometime early next year. But, Dr. David Webb is confident that it will be "bankable".

Dave's confidence is based on a number of factors, to discussed here at another time. But, what remains unanswered, perhaps only temporarily, is whether it's hopefully a robust Pre-Feasibility! And, will it be as good as having a Feasibility Study? Dave Webb suggests that it will be in so far, at least, that he's said that Tyhee could go into production without a Feasibility.

So maybe I've just convinced myself that JP's answer was actually more of a good fit for describing Tyhee as that more successful of the two "hypothetical" juniors then I originally thought.

Baires