20121,

I just sent Webb an email in the hope that he could clarify what both you and I found remarkable about what was written about Big Sky. Here's the email,

Dave,

"Could you please help me understand what is written about Big Sky in the 2007 Annual Report, " We are encouraged by the potential size of these zones although the low-grades will make development a challenge."

Is this idea based on grab samples only? And, is it describing all of Big Sky, including Area 51 of Big Sky where the fist four Big Sky holes were drilled?
If it's related the larger area, not including Area 51 section of Big Sky, are grab sample data sufficient to come to the conclusion quoted above?"

I await Dave's reply,

Baires