With respect to TRE and this link it is interesting. My interest in this discussion is not arguing whther TRE has portential or not. It is not arguing the value of the stock. In other words it is not about arguing its portential.

My interest is in wondering why the stock is so weak with so much potential. Typically stocks are forward looking. For example, the Stamico project according to this link has 825,000 ounces in the ground. If TRE gets to keep 55% or 453,000 ounces or at today's gold prices $656 million or in net to tre before tax $262 million. Divide 100 million shares into that ar you get $2.62 per share.

The question is why that is not factored into the stock price. Or is it? Is all the forward looking potetnital factored in already?

That is my interest in this discussion. You think I am saying that TRE has no potential. I am saying and have always been saying why all this potetntial and value has not been reflected in the stock price already? And since I suspect the price of the stock is going down to 5 why isn't all this value reflected? That is what I am wondering and if you look at the last 5 years TRE is scoring lower highs. so why isn't all this value reflected as it should be?