But, alas, Sandy9 bashes TCM and MOL and obviously knows the inside scoop that the author of the Barron's article is not privy to, LOL!

I didn't bash MOL or TCM, however you have continued to bash

TTM AFTER selling your shares and buying MOL.

Now the fact is you sold ttm AT close to its low, and have

bought mol and 68 cents plus as recorded on stockhouse.

Now since then mol as dropped my more than half what you paid!

But i will inform people here MOL (YOUR CHOICE) was a bad

one because they have diluted to close to 120,000,000

shares. In order to get their loan they paid up 15% of the

companies shares, thats why it tanked, and will continue

to tank as moly has dropped and they are not economic.

The actual fact is they need a jv to survive now, as they need

an additional $680,000,000.00 us OR about $980,000,000

australian. Now TO GET THE same terms THEY would have

to give up another 60% of the company. So like you said

in you own words " they will be moth balled". But they have

a severe problem, they are in real danger of paying huge

interest on real debt on money borrowed without production.

So in essence they are stuck between a rock and a hard

place. And thats the stock you own, and bragged about

changing to on stockhouse, a stock you have lost more than

60% of your money in a few days

Now THE REAL KICKER HERE is CHU has no debt, and the capex

required to build chu, will be much lower than the balance

mol HAS YET TO PAY.