As many know I'm deep into TTQ... but I did take a look at BRU with the recent news. Moly in Montana.... and I had to ask myself. "What makes TTQ a better investment?" For those of you who don't know, they have updated a 43-101 on a historial Mo project and it seems they have found about 400M lbs of Mo (indicated and inferred) at about 0.06%.... so some comparable numbers to TTQ in many ways... albeit the lbs are 60%.  And I have no ideas if the geology makes one resource have a higher recovery rate over anther.

O/S shares 70 M to our 40M

Lbs 400M to 600M

Open in all directions...

031cts vs 1.20

both open pit

The biggest differentiator I could come up with is location.

1) TTQ's proximity to TCM and the possibility of a take out gives it the speculative premium.

2) BC Canada

3) TCM's Endako mine issues (cave in etc.)

4) Roads, power, rail, existing infrastructure.

I'm interested in what some of you might think/know as there seem to be more and more Moly plays coming on stream with the favorable world-wide shortage and current 33/lb price tag.

mz