Have been watching the posts closely..... i think we have a good conversation going on here now... well balanced and fousing on the play itself.

We have had a major setback here.... an eye opener from the investors perspective as wellas from the managments perspective..

Hopefully the managment team come through for everyone concerned here... the investors have had a heavy left hook here... and none of us seen that coming.

Full disclosure levels the playing field, and allows investors to evaluate if mangament have been through enough in their exploration techniques and procedures. The company has to be more open with their efforts from now on to keep what investor confidence is remaining.

I cincerly hope that there is a technical explanation for the results so far that indicates a more robust result... but the fact is they jumped the gun on the bulk sample and are now scrambling to complete a data stream that supports continued effor on the Mud lake multiple sills.

The statistical information on each sill should have been more complete long before the first blast to extract the 500t sample.

Had that been done the results on the first sill may have been cursory to taking a sample from the 2nd and 3rd sill.... A ramp would have provided options for continuation to lower levels and increased sample size from whichever sill has potential grades.....

They have some "splainin to do"