Deep,

I never asked for your removal as president.

My only concern was that you were being far too restrictive of material being posted and stifling any real discussion.

I have had no complaint with your posts here.  At least until this one.  And this post is better dealt with by discussion than by post removal.

I feel that what Agoracom has done is more a vote in favour of my censorship style rather than yours.

After all, you removed a fellow hub-leader's posts with no explanation as to how they supposedly violated the 6 rules.

That was not very courteous.

You will note that Agoracom did *not* remove your posting priviledges - that says that they do *not* dissaprove of your posts, only your administration style.

(At least that is my interpretation of their actions)

You will also note that I have not removed any of your posts.

Please let us be rational and civil about this.

While I have no other complaint against you, it was becoming clear from other signs that some kind of effort was going on to start some kind of battle for control.  One I never intiated or wanted.

Agoracom deleted multiple alias users.  That is almost always an attempt to "game" the system.  Not always, just highly likely.

Surely you would not want this kind of vote skewing mechanism at work?