You can't blindly and unthinkingly equate SFMI to these other stocks. Why did each fall in price? Were they in production, as SFMI is? Were they about to produce a steady stream of revenue? Or were they years away from any production or revenue? Did they have a product, or were they still "developing" one? Did they have previously prolifically producing properties still containing billions in resources waiting to be extracted? Will they be producing a product that they can guarantee can readily be sold at market price anywhere in the world? Or are they just talking about potential products and potential sales and contracts that they will have to compete for in a crowded market? Had they been pumped before the financing to inflate the price and secure the financing? I seriously doubt any of the companies you mentioned have even a small fraction of the substance of SFMI. Your obsession with the financing, which has been explained to you many times as being anything but "toxic", is getting tedious.