Reglarjoe, rabidgod, or whatever-

Those threats of someone being a "felon" or in trouble with the SEC simply because he went to the shareholder meeting and came back even more sure of his investment because he actually saw the operations are growing old- you sound like one of the ihub trolls.

You haven't "lost" any money unless you bought higher and sold lower. If you sold, then you probably shouldn't have bought in the first place because you don't seem to have the confidence that comes from doing your DD.

We "dooshbags" don't hype this stock- we do our DD- including going to the SHM- and report what we find. And if you really think that "i know dildos like YOU hype the stock without having any proof or ANYTHING really, to substanciate it,", then you really haven't done any DD at all, not even the minimum of checking out the SFMI web site, or any of the historical and contemporary references that we have pointed out repeatedly. I have yet to see you or any of your ilk reference anything that disproves or even brings into question what has been reported here, much less bring anything at all of substance to the table.

As far as RK, I'm no fan of his either. But don't confuse the PR with the operation. There are plenty of successful companies with less than great PR. A good investor can see the difference.

It's also been posted many times that SFMI will be releasing info when the concentrate is smelted, and won't be releasing partial info before that. You seem as dense as paid- and no master of logic, either, if the only reasons you can think of for no PR are that SFMI doesn't exist (?) or it's weak (double ?).

If you can't bring the level of your discourse up to a civilized level, why don't you just go back to ihub? I'm sure paid, king, dsu, et al. will appreciate your contributions.